Monastic vs Secular Life: Insights on Family and Faith Buddha Knows หน้า 23
หน้าที่ 23 / 81

สรุปเนื้อหา

In this discussion, the monk shares insights on how family life can be restrictive, comparing it to fish in a tank versus fish in the ocean. Marriage is seen as a binding constraint that can obstruct spiritual progress towards Arahantship. While laypeople can reach enlightenment, monks are believed to be on a more direct path to achieving nirvana. The example of Prince Siddhartha illustrates that even with a family, true satisfaction may remain elusive. For those serious about their spiritual journey, monkhood is deemed essential to attain the highest state of enlightenment. Visit dmc.tv for more information.

หัวข้อประเด็น

-Monastic Life
-Family Life
-Buddhism
-Arahantship
-Nirvana

ข้อความต้นฉบับในหน้า

Monastic v.s Secular Life Monica : Good, thank you. What do the monks think about family life? And do you consider family life to be a distraction from your faith? Luang Phaw: Family life is restricted by many factors, similar to a fish swimming in a tank compared to a fish swimming in the ocean. While one is constrained in a specific area, the other enjoys the boundless space of the sea. In other words, we may also compare a married couple to caged birds who are not allowed to fly freely in the sky. So marriage is a binding of life, and family life is not easy. There are several things to worry about, and this would obstruct the path towards Arahantship, the highest attainment in Buddhism. If we wish to attain nirvana, monkhood is the only status that takes you there. For laypeople, they can attain enlightenment up to a certain level, but not the highest level. Look at Prince Siddharta who was blessed with a beautiful wife and an adorable baby boy. He had never found the utmost satisfaction in life although he 25
แสดงความคิดเห็นเป็นคนแรก
Login เพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็น

หนังสือที่เกี่ยวข้อง

Load More