A Changed Region: The Transformation of the Middle East Post 9/11 : หน้า 7/52
The New Middle East : หน้า 7/52 Exploring the significant shifts in the Middle East post-9/11, driven by the Bush administration's policies and the Iraq war's impact.
This analysis reflects on the changes in the Middle East following the events of September 11, 2001, highlighting the ambitious policies of the Bush administration aimed at establishing democracy and peace through intervention in Iraq. President Bush articulated a vision of a new democratic Middle East, but the actual outcomes have largely diverged from these goals, leading to increased instability in countries like Iraq, which, despite U.S. troop presence, remains a divided and violent state. The power dynamics have shifted, particularly with Iran's rising influence in the region and its ongoing nuclear ambitions, further complicating the security landscape. Additionally, the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict has evolved, marked by significant internal divisions among Palestinians and the implications of unilateral Israeli actions. The summary underscores that while some regimes faced challenges, including Syria's diminished role after its withdrawal from Lebanon, the threat of nuclear proliferation and ethnic conflicts has emerged as critical issues. A nuanced understanding of these complexities is essential for assessing the region's future.
หัวข้อประเด็น
- U.S. foreign policy post-9/11 - Impact of the Iraq War - Middle East democratic aspirations - Power shifts in Iran and Iraq - Israeli-Palestinian conflict developments - Nuclear proliferation in the region - Ethnic and confessional divisions
ข้อความต้นฉบับในหน้า
A Changed Region
After September 11, 2001, the Bush administration launched an ambitious policy to forge a new Middle East, with intervention in Iraq as the driver of the transformation. "The establishment of a free Iraq at the heart of the Middle East will be a watershed event in the global democratic revolution," declared President Bush on November 7, 2003. In speech after speech, Bush administration officials made it abundantly clear that they would not pursue a policy directed at managing and containing existing crises, intending instead to leapfrog over them by creating a new region of democracy and peace in which old disputes would become irrelevant. The idea was summarized in a statement by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during the war between Lebanon and Israel in the summer of 2006. Pushing Israel to accept a cease-fire, she argued, would not help, because it would simply re-establish the status quo ante, not help create a new Middle East. The new Middle East was to be a region of mostly democratic countries allied with the United States. Regimes that did not cooperate would be subjected to a combination of sanctions and support for democratic movements, such as the so-called Cedar Revolution of 2005 in Lebanon that forced Syrian troops out of the country. In extreme cases, they might be forced from power.
The Middle East of 2008 is indeed a vastly different region from that of 2001, and the war in Iraq has been the most important driver of this transformation, although by no means the only one. The outcome, however, is not what the Bush administration envisaged. On the contrary; the situation has become worse in many countries. Despite the presence of over 160,000 U.S. troops in Iraq at the end of 2007 and an improvement in the security situation, Iraq remains an unstable, violent, and deeply divided country, indeed a failed state. Progress is being undermined by the refusal of Iraqi political factions to engage in a serious process of reconciliation, as the Bush administration has repeatedly warned. Furthermore, with the demise of Saddam Hussein, the balance of power between Iran and Iraq has been broken, increasing the influence of Tehran in the Gulf and beyond. Meantime, Iran continues its uranium enrichment program undetermined by United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions or the threat of U.S. military action.
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict remains unsolved, but its parameters have changed considerably, with a deep split in the Palestinian ranks and the effects of decades of unilateral Israeli actions calling into question whether a two-state solution can possibly be implemented. Although Lebanon has been largely liberated from direct Syrian domination, the country is deeply divided and teeters on the brink of domestic conflict. The power of Syria has been diminished by the forced withdrawal of its troops from Lebanon, but the country maintains its potential as a spoiler. The threat of nuclear proliferation is not just limited to Iran; from Morocco to the Gulf, a growing number of countries are declaring their intention to develop a nuclear capacity—for civilian use, to be sure, but a nuclear capacity nevertheless. Confessional and ethnic divisions have acquired greater saliency in many countries.