Understanding Dhammakāya in Relation to Paccekabuddhas and Enlightenment DIRI Journal  หน้า 67
หน้าที่ 67 / 141

สรุปเนื้อหา

This study analyzes the term 'dhammakāya' and its relation to enlightenment. Dhammakāya is presented as a singular concept applying to both the Buddha and Paccekabuddhas, emphasizing that 'dhamma' refers to transcendental aspects rather than mere teachings. This clarifies that both enlightened beings, although differing in roles, embody the essence of spiritual realization. Further examination into its connections with noble disciples reveals layers of understanding dhammakāya, allowing exploration of various transcendental paths, fruits, or Nibbāna. This consolidates the idea of dhammakāya as integral to enlightenment and deepens our comprehension of Buddhist philosophy.

หัวข้อประเด็น

- dhammakāya and its significance
- relationship between Buddha and Paccekabuddhas
- transcendental dhamma vs. teachings
- enlightenment and spiritual realization
- implications for noble disciples

ข้อความต้นฉบับในหน้า

early texts that 'dhammakāya' must be singular. 100 In any case, the verse conveys the meaning that a Paccekabuddha has dhamma(s) as his body (or bodies), where 'dhammas' refers to the qualities pertaining to self-enlightenment. Here again, we note the connection between the term dhammakāya and enlightenment. The adjectival (bahu) dhammakāya in the case of Paccekabuddhas is comparable to that in the case of the Buddha's designation. We noted earlier that scholars tend to interpret the component 'dhamma' as 'teaching.' However, this does not fit the adjective '(bahu)dhammakāya' referring to Paccekabuddhas, for Paccekabuddhas do not need a teacher and they themselves are not 'teachers.' They are 'enlightened beings.' This then reinforces the notion that the term dhamma in the adjective 'dhammakāya' corresponds to enlightenment,' i.e., transcendental dhamma(s). It may be argued that the Buddha and Paccekabuddhas are not the same. As the Buddha is a teacher, then it should be fine to say that he 'has teaching as body.' This is unlikely, however, for it would be strange to differentiate that the component 'dhamma' of the adjectival dhammakāya refers to 'teaching' in the case of Buddha, while referring to 'transcendental dhamma' in the case of Paccekabuddhas. Such would give an impression that a Buddha is a 'non-enlightened being,' which is incorrect. The study of this passage thus reinforces our earlier conclusion regarding dhammakāya and the Buddha that the component dhamma in the adjective dhammakāya does not refer to 'teaching,' but 'transcendental dhamma' relating to spiritual realization. In conclusion, our study in this part adds further information that dhammakāya is related not only to the Buddha but also to the enlightenment of Paccekabuddhas. We shall now proceed to examine further the meaning of dhammakāya in relation to noble disciples. 100 As Harrison states, the understanding that dhammakāya must be singular is 'later traditional belief' that links 'dhammakāya' with other words for reality such as dhammas, dhammaṭā, dhammaḍhātu, etc. Harrison, op. cit., pp. 44, 48. As observed above, 'dhammakāya' may be identified with any transcendental path, fruit, or Nibbāna. This seems to allow the possibility of different levels of dhammakāya. The study of dhammakāya and noble disciples below will affirm this point.
แสดงความคิดเห็นเป็นคนแรก
Login เพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็น

หนังสือที่เกี่ยวข้อง

Load More