Interpretations of Dhammakāya in Pali Commentaries DIRI Journal  หน้า 82
หน้าที่ 82 / 141

สรุปเนื้อหา

The text discusses the interpretations of the term 'dhammakāya' by various Pali commentators, focusing on Upasena and Buddhadatta, who align with Buddhagōsha, and their views on the Buddha's qualities and spiritual attainment. It also highlights differences in interpretation by Vajirabuddhi, who sees dhammakāya as Buddha’s teaching post his passing, while Sāriputta connects it with the Buddha's enlightenment and attributes. The distinctions between dhamma-body and physical body are also elaborated. For further insights, visit dmc.tv.

หัวข้อประเด็น

-Pali commentaries
-Interpretation of dhammakāya
-Buddha's qualities
-Buddhagōsha
-Vajirabuddhi
-Sāriputta

ข้อความต้นฉบับในหน้า

In addition to the above two commentators, Upasena and Buddhadatta141 are also Pali commentators who lived around the same times.142 Upasena agrees with Buddhagōsha in regard to his interpretations of dhammakāya as related to the Buddha’s qualities or spiritual attainment.143 None of his writings interprets the term dhammakāya in the sense of ‘teaching.’ Likewise, Buddhadatta differentiates dhammakāya or dhamma-body from the Buddha’s physical body (rūpakāya).144 He expresses the beauty of the Buddha by means of the properties (guṇa) of both his physical body and his dhamma-body.145 Later in the eleventh to twelfth centuries CE, two commentators of the Pali Vinaya differ slightly in their interpretations of dhammakāya. Vajirabuddhi usually interprets the term dhammakāya in the sense of Buddha’s teaching or dhamma-vinaya that takes the role of the teacher after the Buddha’s passing,146 while Sāriputta prefers to relate the term dhammakāya with the Buddha’s enlightenment147 or to identify it with the Buddha’s qualities (buddhaguṇa)148 and as that which can be seen through the disciples’ spiritual attainment.149
แสดงความคิดเห็นเป็นคนแรก
Login เพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็น

หนังสือที่เกี่ยวข้อง

Load More